Persistence and change in protected area management: Human occupation as a political pressure point in São Paulo, Brazil
This dissertation analyzes the effectiveness of institutions for nature conservation by studying the management of environmentally protected areas in the State of São Paulo, Brazil in the last two decades. Using the issue of illegal human occupation to guide research in four protected areas, the dissertation addresses the question of how management has confronted the disjunction between legislation barring occupation and the reality of occupation on the ground in these areas. I examine the legal, governmental, and practical structures for the administration of protected areas. The research finds that government agencies relegated decisionmaking responsibilities on human occupation to the managers and staff of protected areas. The staff, in turn, developed informal measures and agreements to attempt reconciliation of occupation and the legal mandate. These unofficial strategies were often plagued by inconsistency and other weaknesses.