The state, feminism, and gendered citizenship: Constructing rights in women's police stations in Sao Paulo
This dissertation examines the changing relationship between the state and society, and the construction of gendered citizenship in São Paulo since the early 1980s, using the case of women's police stations (run by policewomen to investigate crimes committed against women). I reconstruct theories on the state and gender, as produced, among others, by Sonia Alvarez, Nancy Fraser, and Georgina Waylen, explicating how the (trans)formation of state agents' and social actors' interests matters for the construction of women's rights. Based on interview and participant observation research, I argue that the state is a multifaceted and internally contradictory actor. Although state agents have their own interests, their relationship with civil society actors can change. The interests of both are reciprocally reconstructed depending on interactions at the level of daily work experience, the strength of social movements, and the political context. First created in 1985 in a context of democratization and in response to feminist critique of sexism in regular police stations (mostly male), women's police stations constitute a site within the state where policewomen, feminists, and clients engage in struggles over the meaning of violence against women as a crime. Since the early 1980s, a gender perspective (male-versus-female) has emerged as hegemonic within women's movements, privileging gender violence (e.g., conjugal violence) over forms of violence constructed by counter-hegemonic feminist discourses (e.g., racial violence, homophobia). While policewomen both legitimize and undermine the hegemonic feminist discourse, battered women begin to articulate a distinct gender identity and women's rights discourse when pressing charges. The case of women's police stations shows that while state and society can engender each other even within the same political context, both policewomen and feminists construct a contradictory gendered citizenship whereby certain women (e.g., wives) have access to justice, whereas others (e.g., black women, lesbians) do not. This leads to a core thesis: the state and social movements are actors and sites of discursive and power struggles over the construction of social categories within which different groups may (or may not) claim rights. To be more inclusive, gendered citizenship must rest on a broad construction of women's interests